Comparison

Viande hachée pur boeuf, 5% Matière Grasse, France, 500g vs Naudan jauheliha

Overall, Naudan jauheliha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientViande hachée pur boeuf, 5%...Naudan jauheliha
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 242 kcal 170 kcal
Fat 15.8 g 10 g
Saturated fat 7 g 4.5 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 24.9 g 20 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Naudan jauheliha has 30% fewer calories (170 kcal vs 242 kcal).
  • Naudan jauheliha has 37% less fat (10 g vs 15.8 g).
  • Naudan jauheliha has 35% less saturated fat (4.5 g vs 7 g).
  • Viande hachée pur boeuf, 5% Matière Grasse, France, 500g has 20% more protein (24.9 g vs 20 g).

Ingredients

Viande hachée pur boeuf, 5% Matière Grasse, France, 500g

VIANDE HACHEE PUR BOEUF

Naudan jauheliha

Naudanliha 100 %.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Viande hachée pur boeuf, 5% Matière Grasse, France, 500g or Naudan jauheliha?

Overall, Naudan jauheliha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Naudan jauheliha has fewer calories: 170 kcal versus 242 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Viande hachée pur boeuf, 5% Matière Grasse, France, 500g has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons