Steak mince less than 5% fat vs Naudan jauheliha
Overall, Steak mince less than 5% fat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Steak mince less than 5% fat | Naudan jauheliha |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 121 kcal | 170 kcal |
| Fat | 4.3 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 4.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 20.4 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Steak mince less than 5% fat has 29% fewer calories (121 kcal vs 170 kcal).
- Steak mince less than 5% fat has 57% less fat (4.3 g vs 10 g).
- Steak mince less than 5% fat has 60% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 4.5 g).
- Naudan jauheliha has 73% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Steak mince less than 5% fat has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Steak mince less than 5% fat
British Beef Steak Mince Lean minced beef steak. Nutrition Typical values (as sold) Energy Fat
Naudan jauheliha
Naudanliha 100 %.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Steak mince less than 5% fat or Naudan jauheliha?
Overall, Steak mince less than 5% fat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Steak mince less than 5% fat has fewer calories: 121 kcal versus 170 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Steak mince less than 5% fat has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.