Goldsaft Sirup vs Vuna
Overall, Vuna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Goldsaft Sirup | Vuna |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 306 kcal | 279 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 19.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 66 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 22.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Goldsaft Sirup has 97% less fat (0.5 g vs 19.9 g).
- Goldsaft Sirup has 96% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 2.3 g).
- Vuna has no sugar, while Goldsaft Sirup has 66 g.
- Goldsaft Sirup has 78% more fiber (5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Vuna has 90% more protein (22.6 g vs 2.3 g).
- Vuna has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Vuna lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Goldsaft Sirup
Zuckerrüben
Vuna
Acqua, proteine di pisello (18,7%), olio di colza, proteine di FRUMENTO (79%), aromi, fibra alimentare (agrumi),sale. Può contenere: UOVA, SOIA.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Goldsaft Sirup or Vuna?
Overall, Vuna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vuna has fewer calories: 279 kcal versus 306 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vuna has less sugar: 0 g versus 66 g per 100 g.