Comparison

Gerstenmalz extrakt vs Malto d'orzo

Overall, Gerstenmalz extrakt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGerstenmalz extraktMalto d'orzo
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 288 kcal 314 kcal
Fat 0.3 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.1 g
Sugars 45 g 50 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Protein 5 g 4.4 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Gerstenmalz extrakt has 10% less sugar (45 g vs 50 g).
  • Gerstenmalz extrakt has 12% more protein (5 g vs 4.4 g).
  • Only Gerstenmalz extrakt lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Gerstenmalz extrakt

_Gerstenmalz_, Wasser

Malto d'orzo

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Gerstenmalz extrakt or Malto d'orzo?

Overall, Gerstenmalz extrakt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gerstenmalz extrakt has fewer calories: 288 kcal versus 314 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Gerstenmalz extrakt has less sugar: 45 g versus 50 g per 100 g.

More comparisons