Gerstenmalz extrakt vs Malto d'orzo
Overall, Gerstenmalz extrakt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gerstenmalz extrakt | Malto d'orzo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 288 kcal | 314 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 45 g | 50 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 5 g | 4.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gerstenmalz extrakt has 10% less sugar (45 g vs 50 g).
- Gerstenmalz extrakt has 12% more protein (5 g vs 4.4 g).
- Only Gerstenmalz extrakt lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Gerstenmalz extrakt
_Gerstenmalz_, Wasser
Malto d'orzo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gerstenmalz extrakt or Malto d'orzo?
Overall, Gerstenmalz extrakt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gerstenmalz extrakt has fewer calories: 288 kcal versus 314 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gerstenmalz extrakt has less sugar: 45 g versus 50 g per 100 g.