Comparison

Golden Corn Syrup vs Gerstenmalz extrakt

Overall, Gerstenmalz extrakt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGolden Corn SyrupGerstenmalz extrakt
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 1
Calories 400 kcal 288 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.3 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.2 g
Sugars 36.7 g 45 g
Salt 0.3 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0 g 5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Gerstenmalz extrakt has 28% fewer calories (288 kcal vs 400 kcal).
  • Golden Corn Syrup has no fat, while Gerstenmalz extrakt has 0.3 g.
  • Golden Corn Syrup has 19% less sugar (36.7 g vs 45 g).
  • Gerstenmalz extrakt has 100% more protein (5 g vs 0 g).
  • Gerstenmalz extrakt is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Gerstenmalz extrakt lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Golden Corn Syrup

Sugars (glucose, fancy molasses), Water, Salt, Vanillin.

Gerstenmalz extrakt

_Gerstenmalz_, Wasser

FAQ

Which is healthier: Golden Corn Syrup or Gerstenmalz extrakt?

Overall, Gerstenmalz extrakt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gerstenmalz extrakt has fewer calories: 288 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Golden Corn Syrup has less sugar: 36.7 g versus 45 g per 100 g.

More comparisons