Comparison

Galette Sarrasine vs Buckwheat Cakes

Overall, Buckwheat Cakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGalette SarrasineBuckwheat Cakes
Nutri-Score — a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 340 kcal 346 kcal
Fat 2.7 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 0 g
Sugars 1.3 g 0 g
Salt 1.2 g 0 g
Fiber 8.4 g 0 g
Protein 10.8 g 12.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Buckwheat Cakes has no fat, while Galette Sarrasine has 2.7 g.
  • Buckwheat Cakes has no saturated fat, while Galette Sarrasine has 0.6 g.
  • Buckwheat Cakes has no sugar, while Galette Sarrasine has 1.3 g.
  • Buckwheat Cakes has no salt, while Galette Sarrasine has 1.2 g.
  • Galette Sarrasine has 100% more fiber (8.4 g vs 0 g).
  • Buckwheat Cakes has 14% more protein (12.5 g vs 10.8 g).

Ingredients

Galette Sarrasine

Galett SarraSir Savourez nos galettes sarrasines, croquantes et légères, 100 % farine de sarrasin sélectionnée pour ses qualités: • Certifiées biologiques, sans OGM, sans conservateurs et sans arômes artificiels •Riche en magnésium, contenant 8 % des apports quotidiens recommandés par portion •Riche en fibres, contenant 7% des apports quotidiens recommandés par portion À déguster salées ou sucrées, le matin, midi et soir, comme tartine en remplacement du pain. 8x For France Poids net / Net weight / Nettogewicht/ Netto gewicht / Peso 160 g

Buckwheat Cakes

buckwheat

FAQ

Which is healthier: Galette Sarrasine or Buckwheat Cakes?

Overall, Buckwheat Cakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Galette Sarrasine has fewer calories: 340 kcal versus 346 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Buckwheat Cakes has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons