Comparison

Flönz vs Filet d’ardenne

Overall, Filet d’ardenne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFlönzFilet d’ardenne
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 371 kcal 143 kcal
Fat 35 g 3 g
Saturated fat 12.5 g 1.1 g
Sugars 0.3 g 0.9 g
Salt 2 g 4.4 g
Protein 13 g 28 g
Additives13
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet d’ardenne has 61% fewer calories (143 kcal vs 371 kcal).
  • Filet d’ardenne has 91% less fat (3 g vs 35 g).
  • Filet d’ardenne has 91% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 12.5 g).
  • Flönz has 67% less sugar (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Flönz has 55% less salt (2 g vs 4.4 g).
  • Filet d’ardenne has 54% more protein (28 g vs 13 g).
  • Flönz is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Filet d’ardenne lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Flönz

72% Schweinefleisch, 13% Speck, Schweineblut, 3% Schweineschwarten, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Gewürze, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit, Naturdarm Rind, Rauch.

Filet d’ardenne

Viande de porc, sel, épices, plantes INGREDIENT aromatiques, extraits d'épices, arôme, oignon, ail, antioxydant: E301; conservateur: E250, E252; ferments, fumée, traitement de surface: conservateur: E202 Peut contenir des traces de: lait. Filet d'Ardevise 100 g de produit préparé à partir de 123 g de viande. Emballé sous atmosphère protectrice. Pour un goût optimal, dégustez-le 15 min après ouverture.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Flönz or Filet d’ardenne?

Overall, Filet d’ardenne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet d’ardenne has fewer calories: 143 kcal versus 371 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Flönz has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons