Flohsamenschalen vs Psílio
Overall, Flohsamenschalen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Flohsamenschalen | Psílio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 40 kcal | 69 kcal |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 84 g | 75 g |
| Protein | 3.8 g | 3.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Flohsamenschalen has 42% fewer calories (40 kcal vs 69 kcal).
- Psílio has 46% less fat (1.5 g vs 2.8 g).
- Psílio has 60% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1 g).
- Flohsamenschalen has no sugar, while Psílio has 1.6 g.
- Flohsamenschalen has 11% more fiber (84 g vs 75 g).
- Flohsamenschalen has 11% more protein (3.8 g vs 3.4 g).
Ingredients
Flohsamenschalen
Flohsamenschalen
Psílio
Casca de psílio (95%)*. *Produto de origem biológica.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Flohsamenschalen or Psílio?
Overall, Flohsamenschalen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Flohsamenschalen has fewer calories: 40 kcal versus 69 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Flohsamenschalen has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.