Fleischzubereitung Rind vs Apfel pur
Overall, Apfel pur has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fleischzubereitung Rind | Apfel pur |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 113 kcal | 46 kcal |
| Fat | 5.8 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 9.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 8.7 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Apfel pur has 60% fewer calories (46 kcal vs 113 kcal).
- Apfel pur has 97% less fat (0.2 g vs 5.8 g).
- Apfel pur has 97% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 2.1 g).
- Fleischzubereitung Rind has 99% less sugar (0.1 g vs 9.9 g).
- Apfel pur has 85% more fiber (1.3 g vs 0.2 g).
- Fleischzubereitung Rind has 97% more protein (8.7 g vs 0.3 g).
- Apfel pur has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Fleischzubereitung Rind
Wasser, Rindfleisch 40%, Reisvollkornmehl, Rapsöl
Apfel pur
Äpfel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fleischzubereitung Rind or Apfel pur?
Overall, Apfel pur has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Apfel pur has fewer calories: 46 kcal versus 113 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fleischzubereitung Rind has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 9.9 g per 100 g.