Comparison

Fleischzubereitung Rind vs Apfel pur

Overall, Apfel pur has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFleischzubereitung RindApfel pur
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 113 kcal 46 kcal
Fat 5.8 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 2.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0.1 g 9.9 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 0.2 g 1.3 g
Protein 8.7 g 0.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Apfel pur has 60% fewer calories (46 kcal vs 113 kcal).
  • Apfel pur has 97% less fat (0.2 g vs 5.8 g).
  • Apfel pur has 97% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Fleischzubereitung Rind has 99% less sugar (0.1 g vs 9.9 g).
  • Apfel pur has 85% more fiber (1.3 g vs 0.2 g).
  • Fleischzubereitung Rind has 97% more protein (8.7 g vs 0.3 g).
  • Apfel pur has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Fleischzubereitung Rind

Wasser, Rindfleisch 40%, Reisvollkornmehl, Rapsöl

Apfel pur

Äpfel

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fleischzubereitung Rind or Apfel pur?

Overall, Apfel pur has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Apfel pur has fewer calories: 46 kcal versus 113 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fleischzubereitung Rind has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 9.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons