Fleischzubereitung Rind vs Bio Baby-Beikost-Öl
Overall, Fleischzubereitung Rind has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fleischzubereitung Rind | Bio Baby-Beikost-Öl |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 2 |
| Calories | 113 kcal | 900 kcal |
| Fat | 5.8 g | 100 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 9.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 8.7 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fleischzubereitung Rind has 87% fewer calories (113 kcal vs 900 kcal).
- Fleischzubereitung Rind has 94% less fat (5.8 g vs 100 g).
- Fleischzubereitung Rind has 77% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 9.1 g).
- Fleischzubereitung Rind has 100% more protein (8.7 g vs 0 g).
- Fleischzubereitung Rind is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Fleischzubereitung Rind
Wasser, Rindfleisch 40%, Reisvollkornmehl, Rapsöl
Bio Baby-Beikost-Öl
Rapsöl 50%, Sonnenblumenöl 45%, Hanfsamenöl 5% (kaltgepresst)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fleischzubereitung Rind or Bio Baby-Beikost-Öl?
Overall, Fleischzubereitung Rind has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fleischzubereitung Rind has fewer calories: 113 kcal versus 900 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio Baby-Beikost-Öl has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.