Comparison

Flapjack Oat Bar Coconut vs Oat Bar Matcha radpberry

Overall, Oat Bar Matcha radpberry has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFlapjack Oat Bar CoconutOat Bar Matcha radpberry
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — 3
Calories 446 kcal 469 kcal
Fat 22 g 27 g
Saturated fat 9 g 5.4 g
Sugars 26 g 20 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.6 g
Fiber 4.8 g 9.6 g
Protein 6.5 g 11 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Flapjack Oat Bar Coconut has 19% less fat (22 g vs 27 g).
  • Oat Bar Matcha radpberry has 40% less saturated fat (5.4 g vs 9 g).
  • Oat Bar Matcha radpberry has 23% less sugar (20 g vs 26 g).
  • Flapjack Oat Bar Coconut has 88% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Oat Bar Matcha radpberry has 50% more fiber (9.6 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Oat Bar Matcha radpberry has 41% more protein (11 g vs 6.5 g).
  • Only Oat Bar Matcha radpberry lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Flapjack Oat Bar Coconut

Not available.

Oat Bar Matcha radpberry

Glutenfreie Vollkorn-Haferflocken 34%, Kokosblütensirup, Sonnenblumenkernpaste aus gerösteten Sonnenblumenkemen, Mandelpaste, Stücke aus weißem Kakaobuttererzeugnis 6% (Kakaobutter 2,4%, Kokosblútenzucker, glutenfreie Vollkorn-Haferflocken, Meersalz), Sheabutter, Matcha-Pulver 1,0%, gefriergetrocknete Hi beerstücke 1,5%, Gerstengraspulver 0,8%, Meersalz.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Flapjack Oat Bar Coconut or Oat Bar Matcha radpberry?

Overall, Oat Bar Matcha radpberry has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Flapjack Oat Bar Coconut has fewer calories: 446 kcal versus 469 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Oat Bar Matcha radpberry has less sugar: 20 g versus 26 g per 100 g.

More comparisons