Comparison

Flapjack Oat Bar Coconut vs Chewy cinnamon roll oat bars

Overall, Chewy cinnamon roll oat bars has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFlapjack Oat Bar CoconutChewy cinnamon roll oat bars
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group — 4
Calories 446 kcal 358 kcal
Fat 22 g 14 g
Saturated fat 9 g 1.8 g
Sugars 26 g 2.8 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.3 g
Fiber 4.8 g 27 g
Protein 6.5 g 8.6 g
Additives04
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chewy cinnamon roll oat bars has 20% fewer calories (358 kcal vs 446 kcal).
  • Chewy cinnamon roll oat bars has 36% less fat (14 g vs 22 g).
  • Chewy cinnamon roll oat bars has 80% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 9 g).
  • Chewy cinnamon roll oat bars has 89% less sugar (2.8 g vs 26 g).
  • Chewy cinnamon roll oat bars has 82% more fiber (27 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Chewy cinnamon roll oat bars has 24% more protein (8.6 g vs 6.5 g).
  • Chewy cinnamon roll oat bars has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Flapjack Oat Bar Coconut

Not available.

Chewy cinnamon roll oat bars

30% gluten free whole grain oats, tapioca fibre, chicory root fibre, brown rice (brown rice, emulsifier (lecithin)), sunflower seed butter, water, pumpkin seed, sunflower seed, humectant (glycerol), sunflower oil, quinoa, flavouring, sea salt, 02% cinnamon, plant-based gelling agent (agar).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Flapjack Oat Bar Coconut or Chewy cinnamon roll oat bars?

Overall, Chewy cinnamon roll oat bars has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chewy cinnamon roll oat bars has fewer calories: 358 kcal versus 446 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chewy cinnamon roll oat bars has less sugar: 2.8 g versus 26 g per 100 g.

More comparisons