Flakes épeautre vs Copos de trigo espelta integral 0%
Overall, Flakes épeautre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Flakes épeautre
Copos de trigo espelta integral 0%
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Flakes épeautre | Copos de trigo espelta integ... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 375 kcal | 364 kcal |
| Fat | 2.9 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 11 g | 8.8 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 14.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Flakes épeautre has 37% less sugar (1.2 g vs 1.9 g).
- Flakes épeautre has 97% less salt (0 g vs 0.8 g).
- Flakes épeautre has 20% more fiber (11 g vs 8.8 g).
Ingredients
Flakes épeautre
_Blé_ d'épeautre complet*. *biologique. Peut contenir des traces de fruits à coque, de soja, de graines de sésame, de lait, d'arachides, de moutarde et lupin.
Copos de trigo espelta integral 0%
Harina de espelta integral (97,2%), harina de malta de cebada, sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Flakes épeautre or Copos de trigo espelta integral 0%?
Overall, Flakes épeautre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Copos de trigo espelta integral 0% has fewer calories: 364 kcal versus 375 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Flakes épeautre has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.