Dinkelflakes vs Copos de trigo espelta integral 0%
Overall, Copos de trigo espelta integral 0% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Dinkelflakes
Copos de trigo espelta integral 0%
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dinkelflakes | Copos de trigo espelta integ... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 361 kcal | 364 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 9 g | 8.8 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 14.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Copos de trigo espelta integral 0% has 60% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Dinkelflakes
90% Dinkelvollkom, Gerstenmalz, Meersalz
Copos de trigo espelta integral 0%
Harina de espelta integral (97,2%), harina de malta de cebada, sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dinkelflakes or Copos de trigo espelta integral 0%?
Overall, Copos de trigo espelta integral 0% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dinkelflakes has fewer calories: 361 kcal versus 364 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Copos de trigo espelta integral 0% has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 2 g per 100 g.