Dinkel Knusperflakes vs Copos de trigo espelta integral 0%
Overall, Dinkel Knusperflakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dinkel Knusperflakes | Copos de trigo espelta integ... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 364 kcal | 364 kcal |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 8.8 g | 8.8 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 14.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Sesame seeds | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dinkel Knusperflakes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Dinkel Knusperflakes lists: Milk, Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Dinkel Knusperflakes
97,2 % DINKELVOLLKORNMEHL (WEIZEN), GERSTENMALZMEHL, Salz Kann Spuren von SOJA, MILCH (LAKTOSE), SCHALENFRÜCHTEN und SESAM enthalten.
Copos de trigo espelta integral 0%
Harina de espelta integral (97,2%), harina de malta de cebada, sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dinkel Knusperflakes or Copos de trigo espelta integral 0%?
Overall, Dinkel Knusperflakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dinkel Knusperflakes has fewer calories: 364 kcal versus 364 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dinkel Knusperflakes has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.