Comparison

Filière Qualité Carrefour Extra Saumon Fumé Norvège vs Carrefour Bio Filet de Truite Fumé

Overall, Carrefour Bio Filet de Truite Fumé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilière Qualité Carrefour Ex...Carrefour Bio Filet de Truit...
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 181 kcal 131 kcal
Fat 10 g 4.3 g
Saturated fat 1.6 g 0.8 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.5 g 1.6 g
Fiber 1 g 0.5 g
Protein 21 g 23 g
Additives10
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Carrefour Bio Filet de Truite Fumé has 28% fewer calories (131 kcal vs 181 kcal).
  • Carrefour Bio Filet de Truite Fumé has 57% less fat (4.3 g vs 10 g).
  • Carrefour Bio Filet de Truite Fumé has 50% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Filière Qualité Carrefour Extra Saumon Fumé Norvège has 50% more fiber (1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Carrefour Bio Filet de Truite Fumé has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Filière Qualité Carrefour Extra Saumon Fumé Norvège

Saumon Atlantique 98% (Salmo salar, élevé en Norvège), sel, conservateur : vinaigre tamponné, fumée de bois de hêtre.

Carrefour Bio Filet de Truite Fumé

Truite* 98% (Oncorhynchus mykiss, élevée en France ou en Allemagne), sel, fumée de bois de hêtre.*Ingrédient issu de l'agriculture biologique.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filière Qualité Carrefour Extra Saumon Fumé Norvège or Carrefour Bio Filet de Truite Fumé?

Overall, Carrefour Bio Filet de Truite Fumé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Carrefour Bio Filet de Truite Fumé has fewer calories: 131 kcal versus 181 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filière Qualité Carrefour Extra Saumon Fumé Norvège has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons