Comparison

Filets de truite pâle fumés vs Regenbogenforellenfilets über Eichenholzrauch heiß geräuchert

Overall, Filets de truite pâle fumés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilets de truite pâle fumésRegenbogenforellenfilets übe...
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 127 kcal 157 kcal
Fat 4 g 7.7 g
Saturated fat 1 g 1.7 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 2 g 2 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 23 g 22.8 g
Additives00
AllergensFishRegenbogenforellenfilets

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filets de truite pâle fumés has 19% fewer calories (127 kcal vs 157 kcal).
  • Filets de truite pâle fumés has 48% less fat (4 g vs 7.7 g).
  • Filets de truite pâle fumés has 41% less saturated fat (1 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Regenbogenforellenfilets über Eichenholzrauch heiß geräuchert has no sugar, while Filets de truite pâle fumés has 0.5 g.
  • Filets de truite pâle fumés has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Filets de truite pâle fumés lists: Fish.
  • Only Regenbogenforellenfilets über Eichenholzrauch heiß geräuchert lists: Regenbogenforellenfilets.

Ingredients

Filets de truite pâle fumés

TRUITE (Oncorhynchus mykiss) 97%, SEL,

Regenbogenforellenfilets über Eichenholzrauch heiß geräuchert

97% Regenbogenforellenfilets, Speisesalz, Eichenholzrauch.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filets de truite pâle fumés or Regenbogenforellenfilets über Eichenholzrauch heiß geräuchert?

Overall, Filets de truite pâle fumés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filets de truite pâle fumés has fewer calories: 127 kcal versus 157 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Regenbogenforellenfilets über Eichenholzrauch heiß geräuchert has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons