Comparison

Filets de maquereaux vs Filetti di alici marinate GDM

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilets de maquereauxFiletti di alici marinate GD...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — 3
Calories 193 kcal 225 kcal
Fat 14 g 17 g
Saturated fat 2.9 g 3.5 g
Sugars 2 g 0 g
Salt 3 g 1.5 g
Fiber — 0.1 g
Protein 13 g 18 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filets de maquereaux has 14% fewer calories (193 kcal vs 225 kcal).
  • Filets de maquereaux has 18% less fat (14 g vs 17 g).
  • Filets de maquereaux has 17% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Filetti di alici marinate GDM has no sugar, while Filets de maquereaux has 2 g.
  • Filetti di alici marinate GDM has 50% less salt (1.5 g vs 3 g).
  • Filetti di alici marinate GDM has 28% more protein (18 g vs 13 g).
  • Only Filetti di alici marinate GDM lists: Fish, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Filets de maquereaux

POINTE DE PENMARC'H LE MEILLEUR DE LA PENE DEPUIS IN FILETS DE SALERARE MAIN MAQUEREAUX PEONES EN ATLANTIQUE NORD-EST À LA SAUCE TOMATE ET AUX PETITS LEGUMES

Filetti di alici marinate GDM

ALICI 84% (Engraulis encrasicolus), olio di girasole, prezzemolo, aglio, ACETO DI VINO, acqua, sale. Contiene: PESCE e SOLFITI. Può contenere MOLLUSCHI, CROSTACEI, UOVA, SOIA, SEDANO, GLUTINE. Conservare tra +2°C

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filets de maquereaux or Filetti di alici marinate GDM?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filets de maquereaux has fewer calories: 193 kcal versus 225 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filetti di alici marinate GDM has less sugar: 0 g versus 2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons