Filets de harengs fumés au naturel vs Herens
Overall, Herens has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Filets de harengs fumés au naturel
Herens
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de harengs fumés au n... | Herens |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 163 kcal | 163 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 2.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 6.5 g | 4.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Herens has 31% less salt (4.5 g vs 6.5 g).
Ingredients
Filets de harengs fumés au naturel
Hareng (Clupea harengus) 93.5%, sel 6.5%. Harengs pêchés en Océan Atlantique Nord-Est (Mer de Norvège, Mer du Nord, Islande et Féroé, Mer Celtique et Manche, Ouest Ecosse) avec : sennes, chaluts, filets tournants et filets soulevés.
Herens
clupea harengus, poivre noir, sel marin, fumé au bois de hêtre
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de harengs fumés au naturel or Herens?
Overall, Herens has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de harengs fumés au naturel has fewer calories: 163 kcal versus 163 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de harengs fumés au naturel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.