Filets de harengs fumés au naturel vs Filets de harengs fumés doux
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de harengs fumés au n... | Filets de harengs fumés doux |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 163 kcal | 175 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 3.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 6.5 g | 4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de harengs fumés au naturel has 25% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 3.2 g).
- Filets de harengs fumés au naturel has no sugar, while Filets de harengs fumés doux has 0.5 g.
- Filets de harengs fumés doux has 38% less salt (4 g vs 6.5 g).
- Filets de harengs fumés doux has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Filets de harengs fumés au naturel
Hareng (Clupea harengus) 93.5%, sel 6.5%. Harengs pêchés en Océan Atlantique Nord-Est (Mer de Norvège, Mer du Nord, Islande et Féroé, Mer Celtique et Manche, Ouest Ecosse) avec : sennes, chaluts, filets tournants et filets soulevés.
Filets de harengs fumés doux
Hareng (Clupea harengus) (poisson) 96%, sel 4%.Pêchés en Atlantique Nord-Est (Mer de Norvège, Mer du Nord, Islande et Féroé, Ouest Ecosse, Manche et Mers Celtiques) avec : sennes, chaluts, filets tournants et filets soulevés.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de harengs fumés au naturel or Filets de harengs fumés doux?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de harengs fumés au naturel has fewer calories: 163 kcal versus 175 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de harengs fumés au naturel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.