Comparison

Filets de harengs fumés -25% de sel vs Filets de harengs fumés au naturel

Overall, Filets de harengs fumés au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilets de harengs fumés -25%...Filets de harengs fumés au n...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 227 kcal 163 kcal
Fat 16 g 11 g
Saturated fat 3.6 g 2.4 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 3.3 g 6.5 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 20 g 17 g
Additives40
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filets de harengs fumés au naturel has 28% fewer calories (163 kcal vs 227 kcal).
  • Filets de harengs fumés au naturel has 31% less fat (11 g vs 16 g).
  • Filets de harengs fumés au naturel has 33% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Filets de harengs fumés -25% de sel has 49% less salt (3.3 g vs 6.5 g).
  • Filets de harengs fumés -25% de sel has 15% more protein (20 g vs 17 g).

Ingredients

Filets de harengs fumés -25% de sel

Hareng, sel 3,3%, sucre,: lactate de potassium, diacétate de sodium, acide citrique.

Filets de harengs fumés au naturel

Hareng (Clupea harengus) 93.5%, sel 6.5%. Harengs pêchés en Océan Atlantique Nord-Est (Mer de Norvège, Mer du Nord, Islande et Féroé, Mer Celtique et Manche, Ouest Ecosse) avec : sennes, chaluts, filets tournants et filets soulevés.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filets de harengs fumés -25% de sel or Filets de harengs fumés au naturel?

Overall, Filets de harengs fumés au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filets de harengs fumés au naturel has fewer calories: 163 kcal versus 227 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filets de harengs fumés -25% de sel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons