Filets de Hareng fumés naturel - 200g vs Herens
Overall, Herens has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Filets de Hareng fumés naturel - 200g
Herens
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de Hareng fumés natur... | Herens |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 194 kcal | 163 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.5 g | 2.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 4.3 g | 4.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 17.1 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Herens has 16% fewer calories (163 kcal vs 194 kcal).
- Herens has 21% less fat (11 g vs 14 g).
- Herens has 26% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 3.5 g).
Ingredients
Filets de Hareng fumés naturel - 200g
Hareng (Clupea harengus pêché en Atlantique Nord-Est) 95%, sel 5%. "poissons - Catégorie d'engin de pêche et sous zone de pêche : voir sur l'emballage. "Certains ingrédients ne sont pas français. INFORMATIONS :
Herens
clupea harengus, poivre noir, sel marin, fumé au bois de hêtre
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de Hareng fumés naturel - 200g or Herens?
Overall, Herens has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Herens has fewer calories: 163 kcal versus 194 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de Hareng fumés naturel - 200g has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.