Comparison

Filet de porc mariné à l'andalouse vs Longe de porc

Overall, Filet de porc mariné à l'andalouse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilet de porc mariné à l'and...Longe de porc
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 99 kcal 187 kcal
Fat 2.5 g 5.7 g
Saturated fat 0.8 g 2 g
Sugars 0.4 g 0 g
Salt 1.3 g 3.8 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 18.2 g 34 g
Additives32
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de porc mariné à l'andalouse has 47% fewer calories (99 kcal vs 187 kcal).
  • Filet de porc mariné à l'andalouse has 56% less fat (2.5 g vs 5.7 g).
  • Filet de porc mariné à l'andalouse has 60% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 2 g).
  • Longe de porc has no sugar, while Filet de porc mariné à l'andalouse has 0.4 g.
  • Filet de porc mariné à l'andalouse has 67% less salt (1.3 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Longe de porc has 46% more protein (34 g vs 18.2 g).
  • Filet de porc mariné à l'andalouse has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Filet de porc mariné à l'andalouse

Filet de porc, eau, sel, épices (<0,6%), conservateur (nitrite de sodium), sucre, antioxydants (ascorbate de sodium, citrate de sodium) et arôme naturel. Sans gluten. Peut contenir des traces de SOJA.

Longe de porc

viande de porc, sel, dextrose, épices, arômes, conservateurs: nitrite de sodium, nitrate de potassium.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filet de porc mariné à l'andalouse or Longe de porc?

Overall, Filet de porc mariné à l'andalouse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de porc mariné à l'andalouse has fewer calories: 99 kcal versus 187 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Longe de porc has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons