Comparison

Filet de porc cuit vs Schweinefilet mit Kette

Overall, Schweinefilet mit Kette has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilet de porc cuitSchweinefilet mit Kette
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group — 1
Calories 198 kcal 205 kcal
Fat 4.7 g 9.8 g
Saturated fat 1.6 g 3.5 g
Sugars 20 g 0 g
Salt 2 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 19 g 29.1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de porc cuit has 52% less fat (4.7 g vs 9.8 g).
  • Filet de porc cuit has 55% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Schweinefilet mit Kette has no sugar, while Filet de porc cuit has 20 g.
  • Schweinefilet mit Kette has 94% less salt (0.1 g vs 2 g).
  • Schweinefilet mit Kette has 35% more protein (29.1 g vs 19 g).
  • Schweinefilet mit Kette has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Filet de porc cuit

Not available.

Schweinefilet mit Kette

Schweinefleisch.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filet de porc cuit or Schweinefilet mit Kette?

Overall, Schweinefilet mit Kette has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de porc cuit has fewer calories: 198 kcal versus 205 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Schweinefilet mit Kette has less sugar: 0 g versus 20 g per 100 g.

More comparisons