Filet de porc cuit vs Schweinefilet mit Kette
Overall, Schweinefilet mit Kette has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de porc cuit | Schweinefilet mit Kette |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 198 kcal | 205 kcal |
| Fat | 4.7 g | 9.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 3.5 g |
| Sugars | 20 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 29.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de porc cuit has 52% less fat (4.7 g vs 9.8 g).
- Filet de porc cuit has 55% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 3.5 g).
- Schweinefilet mit Kette has no sugar, while Filet de porc cuit has 20 g.
- Schweinefilet mit Kette has 94% less salt (0.1 g vs 2 g).
- Schweinefilet mit Kette has 35% more protein (29.1 g vs 19 g).
- Schweinefilet mit Kette has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Filet de porc cuit
Not available.
Schweinefilet mit Kette
Schweinefleisch.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de porc cuit or Schweinefilet mit Kette?
Overall, Schweinefilet mit Kette has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de porc cuit has fewer calories: 198 kcal versus 205 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schweinefilet mit Kette has less sugar: 0 g versus 20 g per 100 g.