Comparison
Figues sèches type layer vs Soft figs
Overall, Figues sèches type layer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Figues sèches type layer | Soft figs |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 256 kcal | 209 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 49 g | 48.6 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 9.7 g | — |
| Protein | 3 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Soft figs has 18% fewer calories (209 kcal vs 256 kcal).
- Figues sèches type layer has 40% less fat (0.9 g vs 1.5 g).
- Figues sèches type layer has 68% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.3 g).
- Figues sèches type layer has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Figues sèches type layer
Figues sèches (catégorie 1)
Soft figs
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Figues sèches type layer or Soft figs?
Overall, Figues sèches type layer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Soft figs has fewer calories: 209 kcal versus 256 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Soft figs has less sugar: 48.6 g versus 49 g per 100 g.