Comparison

Erbsen getrocknet vs Bohnen-Käferbohnen

Overall, Erbsen getrocknet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientErbsen getrocknetBohnen-Käferbohnen
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 337 kcal 80 kcal
Fat 1.7 g 0.6 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.2 g
Sugars 1.4 g 4.1 g
Salt 0 g 1 g
Protein 25 g 4.2 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bohnen-Käferbohnen has 76% fewer calories (80 kcal vs 337 kcal).
  • Bohnen-Käferbohnen has 65% less fat (0.6 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Erbsen getrocknet has 66% less sugar (1.4 g vs 4.1 g).
  • Erbsen getrocknet has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1 g).
  • Erbsen getrocknet has 83% more protein (25 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Erbsen getrocknet has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Erbsen getrocknet is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Erbsen getrocknet

Bio Weiße Bohnen

Bohnen-Käferbohnen

Käferbohnen, Wasser, Zucker, Salz, Weingeistessig, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Erbsen getrocknet or Bohnen-Käferbohnen?

Overall, Erbsen getrocknet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bohnen-Käferbohnen has fewer calories: 80 kcal versus 337 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Erbsen getrocknet has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons