Erbsen getrocknet vs Bohnen-Käferbohnen
Overall, Erbsen getrocknet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Erbsen getrocknet | Bohnen-Käferbohnen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 337 kcal | 80 kcal |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 4.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 4.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bohnen-Käferbohnen has 76% fewer calories (80 kcal vs 337 kcal).
- Bohnen-Käferbohnen has 65% less fat (0.6 g vs 1.7 g).
- Erbsen getrocknet has 66% less sugar (1.4 g vs 4.1 g).
- Erbsen getrocknet has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1 g).
- Erbsen getrocknet has 83% more protein (25 g vs 4.2 g).
- Erbsen getrocknet has the better Nutri-Score.
- Erbsen getrocknet is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Erbsen getrocknet
Bio Weiße Bohnen
Bohnen-Käferbohnen
Käferbohnen, Wasser, Zucker, Salz, Weingeistessig, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Erbsen getrocknet or Bohnen-Käferbohnen?
Overall, Erbsen getrocknet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bohnen-Käferbohnen has fewer calories: 80 kcal versus 337 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Erbsen getrocknet has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.