Comparison

Bohnen-Käferbohnen vs No Added Sugar Beanz in Tomato Sauce 6 x

Overall, No Added Sugar Beanz in Tomato Sauce 6 x has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBohnen-KäferbohnenNo Added Sugar Beanz in Toma...
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 80 kcal 66 kcal
Fat 0.6 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.1 g
Sugars 4.1 g 1.9 g
Salt 1 g 0.4 g
Fiber — 3.6 g
Protein 4.2 g 4.6 g
Additives11
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • No Added Sugar Beanz in Tomato Sauce 6 x has 18% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 80 kcal).
  • No Added Sugar Beanz in Tomato Sauce 6 x has 67% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
  • No Added Sugar Beanz in Tomato Sauce 6 x has 54% less sugar (1.9 g vs 4.1 g).
  • No Added Sugar Beanz in Tomato Sauce 6 x has 60% less salt (0.4 g vs 1 g).
  • No Added Sugar Beanz in Tomato Sauce 6 x has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Bohnen-Käferbohnen is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Bohnen-Käferbohnen

Käferbohnen, Wasser, Zucker, Salz, Weingeistessig, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure.

No Added Sugar Beanz in Tomato Sauce 6 x

beans (50%), tomatoes (37%), water, modified cornflour, spirit vinegar, salt, natural flavouring, spice extracts, sweetener - steviol glycosides, herb extract, contains naturally occuring sugars,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bohnen-Käferbohnen or No Added Sugar Beanz in Tomato Sauce 6 x?

Overall, No Added Sugar Beanz in Tomato Sauce 6 x has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

No Added Sugar Beanz in Tomato Sauce 6 x has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 80 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

No Added Sugar Beanz in Tomato Sauce 6 x has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons