Comparison

Duo de choux assaisonnés vs Pois chiches cuits

Overall, Pois chiches cuits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDuo de choux assaisonnésPois chiches cuits
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 41 kcal 140 kcal
Fat 2.5 g 3.4 g
Saturated fat 1.4 g 0.5 g
Sugars 1.2 g 0 g
Salt 0.7 g 0 g
Fiber 2.9 g 8.7 g
Protein 1.9 g 8 g
Additives00
AllergensCelery, Milk, MustardNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Duo de choux assaisonnés has 71% fewer calories (41 kcal vs 140 kcal).
  • Duo de choux assaisonnés has 26% less fat (2.5 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Pois chiches cuits has 64% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Pois chiches cuits has no sugar, while Duo de choux assaisonnés has 1.2 g.
  • Pois chiches cuits has no salt, while Duo de choux assaisonnés has 0.7 g.
  • Pois chiches cuits has 67% more fiber (8.7 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Pois chiches cuits has 76% more protein (8 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Pois chiches cuits is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Duo de choux assaisonnés lists: Celery, Milk, Mustard.

Ingredients

Duo de choux assaisonnés

Choux-fleurs 48% - brocolis 48% - beurre 2,3% - huile d'olive vierge extra 0,6% - basilic 0,5% - sel - ail - épice. Traces de céréales, de céleri, de moutarde, de soja et leurs dérivés.

Pois chiches cuits

Pois chiches cuits (pois chiche (origine France), eau). Présence éventuelle de gluten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Duo de choux assaisonnés or Pois chiches cuits?

Overall, Pois chiches cuits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Duo de choux assaisonnés has fewer calories: 41 kcal versus 140 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pois chiches cuits has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons