Dry Cured Outdoor Bred British Bacon Rashers vs Dry cured smoked back bacon
Overall, Dry Cured Outdoor Bred British Bacon Rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Dry Cured Outdoor Bred British Bacon Rashers
Dry cured smoked back bacon
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dry Cured Outdoor Bred Briti... | Dry cured smoked back bacon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 166 kcal | 247 kcal |
| Fat | 9.2 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.3 g | 6.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dry Cured Outdoor Bred British Bacon Rashers has 33% fewer calories (166 kcal vs 247 kcal).
- Dry Cured Outdoor Bred British Bacon Rashers has 49% less fat (9.2 g vs 18 g).
- Dry Cured Outdoor Bred British Bacon Rashers has 50% less saturated fat (3.3 g vs 6.6 g).
- Dry cured smoked back bacon has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Dry Cured Outdoor Bred British Bacon Rashers has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Dry Cured Outdoor Bred British Bacon Rashers
British Pork, Sea Salt, Sugar, Preservative: Sodium Nitrite, Sodium Nitrate; Antioxidant: Sodium Ascorbate.
Dry cured smoked back bacon
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dry Cured Outdoor Bred British Bacon Rashers or Dry cured smoked back bacon?
Overall, Dry Cured Outdoor Bred British Bacon Rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dry Cured Outdoor Bred British Bacon Rashers has fewer calories: 166 kcal versus 247 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dry cured smoked back bacon has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.