Dos de cabillaud vs Filetes de merluza del cabo sin piel
Overall, Dos de cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Dos de cabillaud
Filetes de merluza del cabo sin piel
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dos de cabillaud | Filetes de merluza del cabo... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 77 kcal | 82 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 1.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 18 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dos de cabillaud has 50% less fat (0.6 g vs 1.2 g).
- Only Dos de cabillaud lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Dos de cabillaud
Cabillaud MSC (POISSONS) qualité sans arête*, Gadus morhua sauvage pêché aux filets maillants et filets similaires, sennes, chaluts, lignes et hameçons, en Atlantique Nord-Est (FAO 27), sous-zones Mer de Barents (1), Mers de Norvège (II). * Malgré tout le soin apporté à la préparation de nos poissons qualité sans arête, la présence exceptionnelle d'arête n'est jamais exclue.
Filetes de merluza del cabo sin piel
FILETES DE MERLUZA DEL CABO SIN PIEL
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dos de cabillaud or Filetes de merluza del cabo sin piel?
Overall, Dos de cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dos de cabillaud has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 82 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dos de cabillaud has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.