Comparison

Dorade Royale vs Pangasiuefillets, ohne Haut, praktisch grätenfrei, glasiert, tiefgefroren,

Overall, Pangasiuefillets, ohne Haut, praktisch grätenfrei, glasiert, tiefgefroren, has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDorade RoyalePangasiuefillets, ohne Haut,...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 128 kcal 81 kcal
Fat 4.8 g 1.4 g
Saturated fat 1.2 g 0.6 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 20.8 g 17 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pangasiuefillets, ohne Haut, praktisch grätenfrei, glasiert, tiefgefroren, has 37% fewer calories (81 kcal vs 128 kcal).
  • Pangasiuefillets, ohne Haut, praktisch grätenfrei, glasiert, tiefgefroren, has 71% less fat (1.4 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Pangasiuefillets, ohne Haut, praktisch grätenfrei, glasiert, tiefgefroren, has 50% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Dorade Royale has 18% more protein (20.8 g vs 17 g).
  • Only Dorade Royale lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Dorade Royale

100% Dorade Royale

Pangasiuefillets, ohne Haut, praktisch grätenfrei, glasiert, tiefgefroren,

Pangasiusfilet

FAQ

Which is healthier: Dorade Royale or Pangasiuefillets, ohne Haut, praktisch grätenfrei, glasiert, tiefgefroren,?

Overall, Pangasiuefillets, ohne Haut, praktisch grätenfrei, glasiert, tiefgefroren, has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pangasiuefillets, ohne Haut, praktisch grätenfrei, glasiert, tiefgefroren, has fewer calories: 81 kcal versus 128 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Dorade Royale has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons