Comparison

Dark Chocolate Covered Mangoes vs Datteln Kokos Konfekt

Overall, Datteln Kokos Konfekt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDark Chocolate Covered Mango...Datteln Kokos Konfekt
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 429 kcal 312 kcal
Fat 14.3 g 4.3 g
Saturated fat 8.9 g 3.4 g
Sugars 46.4 g 60 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.1 g
Fiber 3.6 g 9.4 g
Protein 3.6 g 2.2 g
Additives20
AllergensSoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Datteln Kokos Konfekt has 27% fewer calories (312 kcal vs 429 kcal).
  • Datteln Kokos Konfekt has 70% less fat (4.3 g vs 14.3 g).
  • Datteln Kokos Konfekt has 62% less saturated fat (3.4 g vs 8.9 g).
  • Dark Chocolate Covered Mangoes has 23% less sugar (46.4 g vs 60 g).
  • Datteln Kokos Konfekt has 62% more fiber (9.4 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Dark Chocolate Covered Mangoes has 38% more protein (3.6 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Datteln Kokos Konfekt has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Datteln Kokos Konfekt is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Dark Chocolate Covered Mangoes lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Dark Chocolate Covered Mangoes

Mango, Sugar, Dark Chocolate (unsweetened, dried cocoa butter, soy lecithin, natural flavors)

Datteln Kokos Konfekt

94% Datteln*, 6% Kokosflocken*. *aus kontrolliert biologischer Landwirtschaft. Kann Spuren von Schalenfrüchten enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate Covered Mangoes or Datteln Kokos Konfekt?

Overall, Datteln Kokos Konfekt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Datteln Kokos Konfekt has fewer calories: 312 kcal versus 429 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Dark Chocolate Covered Mangoes has less sugar: 46.4 g versus 60 g per 100 g.

More comparisons