Dark Chocolate covered Almonds vs M&m's
Overall, Dark Chocolate covered Almonds has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dark Chocolate covered Almon... | M&m's |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 500 kcal | 484 kcal |
| Fat | 36.7 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 14 g |
| Sugars | 33.3 g | 57 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | — |
| Protein | 10 g | 4.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Nuts, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- M&m's has 43% less fat (21 g vs 36.7 g).
- Dark Chocolate covered Almonds has 42% less sugar (33.3 g vs 57 g).
- Dark Chocolate covered Almonds has no salt, while M&m's has 0.3 g.
- Dark Chocolate covered Almonds has 57% more protein (10 g vs 4.3 g).
- Only Dark Chocolate covered Almonds lists: Milk, Nuts, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Dark Chocolate covered Almonds
DARK CHOCOLATE (SUGAR, CHOCOLATE LIQUOR, COCOA BUTTER, MILK FAT, SOY LECITHIN JAN EMULSIFIER], NATURAL FLAVOR), DRY ROASTED ALMONDS, DEXTRIN (CORN), CONFECTIONER'S SHELLAC CONTAINS MILK, ALMOND, SOY. MAY CONTAIN TRACES OF PEANUTS, PECANS, CASHEWS, HAZELNUT, WALNUTS, WHEAT.
M&m's
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate covered Almonds or M&m's?
Overall, Dark Chocolate covered Almonds has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
M&m's has fewer calories: 484 kcal versus 500 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dark Chocolate covered Almonds has less sugar: 33.3 g versus 57 g per 100 g.