Comparison

M&m's vs M&ms

Overall, M&ms has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientM&m'sM&ms
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 484 kcal 524 kcal
Fat 21 g 26 g
Saturated fat 14 g 11 g
Sugars 57 g 53 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 2.3 g
Protein 4.3 g 9.8 g
Additives05
AllergensNone listedMilk, Peanuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • M&m's has 19% less fat (21 g vs 26 g).
  • M&ms has 21% less saturated fat (11 g vs 14 g).
  • M&ms has 56% more protein (9.8 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Only M&ms lists: Milk, Peanuts, Soybeans.

Ingredients

M&m's

Not available.

M&ms

Sucre, cacahuètes, pâte de cacao, lait entier en poudre, beurre de cacao, amidon, matière grasse de palme, sirop de glucose, lait cremé en poudre, lécithine de soja, gomme arabique, matière grasse de karité, perméat de lactosérum, matière grasse du lait, dextrine, cire de carnauba, colorants, huile de palmiste, sel, arôme.

FAQ

Which is healthier: M&m's or M&ms?

Overall, M&ms has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

M&m's has fewer calories: 484 kcal versus 524 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

M&ms has less sugar: 53 g versus 57 g per 100 g.

More comparisons