Comparison

Dark Chocolate covered Almonds vs M&ms

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDark Chocolate covered Almon...M&ms
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 500 kcal 524 kcal
Fat 36.7 g 26 g
Saturated fat 15 g 11 g
Sugars 33.3 g 53 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 10 g 2.3 g
Protein 10 g 9.8 g
Additives15
AllergensMilk, Nuts, SoybeansMilk, Peanuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • M&ms has 29% less fat (26 g vs 36.7 g).
  • M&ms has 27% less saturated fat (11 g vs 15 g).
  • Dark Chocolate covered Almonds has 37% less sugar (33.3 g vs 53 g).
  • Dark Chocolate covered Almonds has 77% more fiber (10 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Only Dark Chocolate covered Almonds lists: Nuts.
  • Only M&ms lists: Peanuts.

Ingredients

Dark Chocolate covered Almonds

DARK CHOCOLATE (SUGAR, CHOCOLATE LIQUOR, COCOA BUTTER, MILK FAT, SOY LECITHIN JAN EMULSIFIER], NATURAL FLAVOR), DRY ROASTED ALMONDS, DEXTRIN (CORN), CONFECTIONER'S SHELLAC CONTAINS MILK, ALMOND, SOY. MAY CONTAIN TRACES OF PEANUTS, PECANS, CASHEWS, HAZELNUT, WALNUTS, WHEAT.

M&ms

Sucre, cacahuètes, pâte de cacao, lait entier en poudre, beurre de cacao, amidon, matière grasse de palme, sirop de glucose, lait cremé en poudre, lécithine de soja, gomme arabique, matière grasse de karité, perméat de lactosérum, matière grasse du lait, dextrine, cire de carnauba, colorants, huile de palmiste, sel, arôme.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate covered Almonds or M&ms?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dark Chocolate covered Almonds has fewer calories: 500 kcal versus 524 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Dark Chocolate covered Almonds has less sugar: 33.3 g versus 53 g per 100 g.

More comparisons