Croustibat x16 vs Omega 3 Breaded Alaska Pollock Fish Fingers
Overall, Croustibat x16 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Croustibat x16 | Omega 3 Breaded Alaska Pollo... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 188 kcal | 208 kcal |
| Fat | 7.4 g | 9.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Croustibat x16 has 19% less fat (7.4 g vs 9.1 g).
- Croustibat x16 has the better Nutri-Score.
- Omega 3 Breaded Alaska Pollock Fish Fingers is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Croustibat x16
colin d'alaska 61%, chapelure 15%, (farine de blé 14%, huile de colza, sel , épices, levures), eau, huiles végétales (colza, coprah), farine de blé 5.8%, amidon de blé, sel, poivre blanc, arôme naturel.
Omega 3 Breaded Alaska Pollock Fish Fingers
Alaska Pollock (FISH) (58%), Rapeseed Oil. Breadcrumb Coating (WHEAT Flour, Water, Potato Starch, Salt, Paprika, Yeast, Turmeric).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Croustibat x16 or Omega 3 Breaded Alaska Pollock Fish Fingers?
Overall, Croustibat x16 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Croustibat x16 has fewer calories: 188 kcal versus 208 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Croustibat x16 has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.