Bâtonnets Colin d'Alaska MSC vs Croustibat x16
Overall, Croustibat x16 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bâtonnets Colin d'Alaska MSC | Croustibat x16 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 222 kcal | 188 kcal |
| Fat | 9.4 g | 7.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Croustibat x16 has 15% fewer calories (188 kcal vs 222 kcal).
- Croustibat x16 has 21% less fat (7.4 g vs 9.4 g).
- Croustibat x16 has 36% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.1 g).
- Croustibat x16 has the better Nutri-Score.
- Bâtonnets Colin d'Alaska MSC is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Bâtonnets Colin d'Alaska MSC
Colin d'Alaska 58%, chapelure 20% (farine de blé 17%, eau, épices, sel, levure), huile de colza, eau, farine de blé 4%, amidon, sel, huile de poisson 0,29%,
Croustibat x16
colin d'alaska 61%, chapelure 15%, (farine de blé 14%, huile de colza, sel , épices, levures), eau, huiles végétales (colza, coprah), farine de blé 5.8%, amidon de blé, sel, poivre blanc, arôme naturel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bâtonnets Colin d'Alaska MSC or Croustibat x16?
Overall, Croustibat x16 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Croustibat x16 has fewer calories: 188 kcal versus 222 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Croustibat x16 has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.