Couscous Gemüsepfanne vs Gemüse mit Hirse
Overall, Gemüse mit Hirse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Couscous Gemüsepfanne | Gemüse mit Hirse |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 53 kcal | 36 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 1.9 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Hatweizengrieß | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gemüse mit Hirse has 32% fewer calories (36 kcal vs 53 kcal).
- Gemüse mit Hirse has 79% less fat (0.3 g vs 1.4 g).
- Gemüse mit Hirse has 32% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.5 g).
- Couscous Gemüsepfanne has 47% more protein (1.9 g vs 1 g).
- Only Couscous Gemüsepfanne lists: Gluten, Hatweizengrieß.
Ingredients
Couscous Gemüsepfanne
Wasser, 31% Karotten, 14% Tomatenpüree*, 8% Zucchini, 4% _Couscous_ (_Hartweizen_), 4% Fenchel, 3% Linsen (rot), 1% Rapsöl, 1% _Hatweizengrieß_
Gemüse mit Hirse
Karotten 45%, Wasser, Kartoffeln 8%, Spinat 5%, Hirsevollkornflocken 4%, Pastinaken 2%, Lauch 1%, Tomatenmark 2-fach konzentriert 0,4%
FAQ
Which is healthier: Couscous Gemüsepfanne or Gemüse mit Hirse?
Overall, Gemüse mit Hirse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gemüse mit Hirse has fewer calories: 36 kcal versus 53 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gemüse mit Hirse has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.