Cooking Cream vs Nata para montar uht 35% m.g.
Overall, Cooking Cream has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cooking Cream | Nata para montar uht 35% m.g... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 269 kcal | 338 kcal |
| Fat | 27 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 24 g |
| Sugars | 3.7 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cooking Cream has 20% fewer calories (269 kcal vs 338 kcal).
- Cooking Cream has 23% less fat (27 g vs 35 g).
- Cooking Cream has 29% less saturated fat (17 g vs 24 g).
- Nata para montar uht 35% m.g. has 19% less sugar (3 g vs 3.7 g).
- Cooking Cream has 32% more protein (2.5 g vs 1.7 g).
- Only Nata para montar uht 35% m.g. lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Cooking Cream
Water, cow's butter, skimmed cow's milk powder, sweet cream buttermilk powder, stabilizer (E407). For Allergens: Contains Milk.
Nata para montar uht 35% m.g.
Nata (35% M.G) y estabilizantes (E-460, E-466).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cooking Cream or Nata para montar uht 35% m.g.?
Overall, Cooking Cream has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cooking Cream has fewer calories: 269 kcal versus 338 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nata para montar uht 35% m.g. has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.