Fluide30% mat. gr. entière vs Nata para montar uht 35% m.g.
Overall, Fluide30% mat. gr. entière has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fluide30% mat. gr. entière | Nata para montar uht 35% m.g... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 293 kcal | 338 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 24 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fluide30% mat. gr. entière has 13% fewer calories (293 kcal vs 338 kcal).
- Fluide30% mat. gr. entière has 14% less fat (30 g vs 35 g).
- Fluide30% mat. gr. entière has 13% less saturated fat (21 g vs 24 g).
- Nata para montar uht 35% m.g. has 12% less sugar (3 g vs 3.4 g).
- Fluide30% mat. gr. entière has 29% more protein (2.4 g vs 1.7 g).
Ingredients
Fluide30% mat. gr. entière
Crème de LAIT, stabilisants : carraghénanes. Elaborée à partir de lait origine France.
Nata para montar uht 35% m.g.
Nata (35% M.G) y estabilizantes (E-460, E-466).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fluide30% mat. gr. entière or Nata para montar uht 35% m.g.?
Overall, Fluide30% mat. gr. entière has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fluide30% mat. gr. entière has fewer calories: 293 kcal versus 338 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nata para montar uht 35% m.g. has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.