Brzo i fino vrhnje za šlag vs Nata para montar uht 35% m.g.
Overall, Brzo i fino vrhnje za šlag has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Brzo i fino vrhnje za šlag | Nata para montar uht 35% m.g... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 318 kcal | 338 kcal |
| Fat | 33 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 24 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | — |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Brzo i fino vrhnje za šlag has 13% less saturated fat (21 g vs 24 g).
- Brzo i fino vrhnje za šlag has 23% more protein (2.2 g vs 1.7 g).
Ingredients
Brzo i fino vrhnje za šlag
Vrhnje s 33 % mliječne masti (mlijeko) 99 %, emulgator: E472e; zgušnjivač: karagenan.
Nata para montar uht 35% m.g.
Nata (35% M.G) y estabilizantes (E-460, E-466).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Brzo i fino vrhnje za šlag or Nata para montar uht 35% m.g.?
Overall, Brzo i fino vrhnje za šlag has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Brzo i fino vrhnje za šlag has fewer calories: 318 kcal versus 338 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nata para montar uht 35% m.g. has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.