Habtejszín 30% vs Nata para montar uht 35% m.g.
Overall, Habtejszín 30% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Habtejszín 30% | Nata para montar uht 35% m.g... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 293 kcal | 338 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 20 g | 24 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 3 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Habtejszín 30% has 13% fewer calories (293 kcal vs 338 kcal).
- Habtejszín 30% has 14% less fat (30 g vs 35 g).
- Habtejszín 30% has 17% less saturated fat (20 g vs 24 g).
- Habtejszín 30% has 23% more protein (2.2 g vs 1.7 g).
Ingredients
Habtejszín 30%
tejszín 99,7%, cukor, laktóz, stabilizátor (karragén) savanyúságot szabályzó anyagok (kalcium-laktát, nátrium-karbonát), dextróz
Nata para montar uht 35% m.g.
Nata (35% M.G) y estabilizantes (E-460, E-466).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Habtejszín 30% or Nata para montar uht 35% m.g.?
Overall, Habtejszín 30% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Habtejszín 30% has fewer calories: 293 kcal versus 338 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nata para montar uht 35% m.g. has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.