Comparison

Confit d’oignon vs Caramelised Red Onion Chutney

Overall, Confit d’oignon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientConfit d’oignonCaramelised Red Onion Chutne...
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 150 kcal 208 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 36 g 49.7 g
Salt 0.3 g 1.4 g
Fiber 1.6 g 1 g
Protein 0.7 g 1.1 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Confit d’oignon has 28% fewer calories (150 kcal vs 208 kcal).
  • Caramelised Red Onion Chutney has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Confit d’oignon has 28% less sugar (36 g vs 49.7 g).
  • Confit d’oignon has 79% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Confit d’oignon has 38% more fiber (1.6 g vs 1 g).
  • Caramelised Red Onion Chutney has 36% more protein (1.1 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Confit d’oignon has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Caramelised Red Onion Chutney is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Confit d’oignon

Oignon (origine France, Hauts de France), sucre, vinaigre d'alcool, vin blanc, gélifiant : pectines, sel, caramel (sucre, eau). Préparé avec 65g d'oignons pour 100g de produit fini.

Caramelised Red Onion Chutney

red onion (31%), sugar, bramley apple, white wine vinegar, balsamic vinegar (red wine vinegar, grape must), muscovado sugar, apple puree, molasses, sea salt, dried onion, ginger purée, garlic purée,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Confit d’oignon or Caramelised Red Onion Chutney?

Overall, Confit d’oignon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Confit d’oignon has fewer calories: 150 kcal versus 208 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Confit d’oignon has less sugar: 36 g versus 49.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons