Compote rhubarbe vs Ekoplaza rabarber
Overall, Ekoplaza rabarber has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Compote rhubarbe | Ekoplaza rabarber |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 93 kcal | 69 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 20 g | 12.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ekoplaza rabarber has 26% fewer calories (69 kcal vs 93 kcal).
- Ekoplaza rabarber has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Ekoplaza rabarber has 36% less sugar (12.8 g vs 20 g).
- Compote rhubarbe has 52% more fiber (2.9 g vs 1.4 g).
- Ekoplaza rabarber has the better Nutri-Score.
- Ekoplaza rabarber is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Compote rhubarbe
Rhubarb, sugar (19%)
Ekoplaza rabarber
80% rabarber, agavesiroop*. *Van biologische oorsprong
FAQ
Which is healthier: Compote rhubarbe or Ekoplaza rabarber?
Overall, Ekoplaza rabarber has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ekoplaza rabarber has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 93 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ekoplaza rabarber has less sugar: 12.8 g versus 20 g per 100 g.