Compote de Rhubarbe vs Ekoplaza rabarber
Overall, Ekoplaza rabarber has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Compote de Rhubarbe | Ekoplaza rabarber |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 110 kcal | 69 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 25 g | 12.8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ekoplaza rabarber has 37% fewer calories (69 kcal vs 110 kcal).
- Ekoplaza rabarber has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Ekoplaza rabarber has 49% less sugar (12.8 g vs 25 g).
- Compote de Rhubarbe has 30% more protein (1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Ekoplaza rabarber has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Compote de Rhubarbe
Not available.
Ekoplaza rabarber
80% rabarber, agavesiroop*. *Van biologische oorsprong
FAQ
Which is healthier: Compote de Rhubarbe or Ekoplaza rabarber?
Overall, Ekoplaza rabarber has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ekoplaza rabarber has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 110 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ekoplaza rabarber has less sugar: 12.8 g versus 25 g per 100 g.