Comparison

Compote de Rhubarbe vs Ekoplaza rabarber

Overall, Ekoplaza rabarber has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCompote de RhubarbeEkoplaza rabarber
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group — 1
Calories 110 kcal 69 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 25 g 12.8 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber — 1.4 g
Protein 1 g 0.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ekoplaza rabarber has 37% fewer calories (69 kcal vs 110 kcal).
  • Ekoplaza rabarber has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Ekoplaza rabarber has 49% less sugar (12.8 g vs 25 g).
  • Compote de Rhubarbe has 30% more protein (1 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Ekoplaza rabarber has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Compote de Rhubarbe

Not available.

Ekoplaza rabarber

80% rabarber, agavesiroop*. *Van biologische oorsprong

FAQ

Which is healthier: Compote de Rhubarbe or Ekoplaza rabarber?

Overall, Ekoplaza rabarber has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ekoplaza rabarber has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 110 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ekoplaza rabarber has less sugar: 12.8 g versus 25 g per 100 g.

More comparisons