Compote de rhubarbe vs Ekoplaza rabarber
Overall, Ekoplaza rabarber has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Compote de rhubarbe | Ekoplaza rabarber |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 115 kcal | 69 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 26 g | 12.8 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ekoplaza rabarber has 40% fewer calories (69 kcal vs 115 kcal).
- Ekoplaza rabarber has 51% less sugar (12.8 g vs 26 g).
- Compote de rhubarbe has 33% more fiber (2.1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Ekoplaza rabarber is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Compote de rhubarbe
rhubarbe* (demeter**) (76%), sucre de canne* (demeter**) (24%)
Ekoplaza rabarber
80% rabarber, agavesiroop*. *Van biologische oorsprong
FAQ
Which is healthier: Compote de rhubarbe or Ekoplaza rabarber?
Overall, Ekoplaza rabarber has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ekoplaza rabarber has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 115 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ekoplaza rabarber has less sugar: 12.8 g versus 26 g per 100 g.