Comparison

Compote Rhubarbe vs Ekoplaza rabarber

Overall, Ekoplaza rabarber has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCompote RhubarbeEkoplaza rabarber
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 95 kcal 69 kcal
Fat 0.1 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 21.4 g 12.8 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 2.9 g 1.4 g
Protein 0.5 g 0.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ekoplaza rabarber has 27% fewer calories (69 kcal vs 95 kcal).
  • Ekoplaza rabarber has 40% less sugar (12.8 g vs 21.4 g).
  • Compote Rhubarbe has 52% more fiber (2.9 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Ekoplaza rabarber is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Compote Rhubarbe

Rhubarbe 90%, sucre.

Ekoplaza rabarber

80% rabarber, agavesiroop*. *Van biologische oorsprong

FAQ

Which is healthier: Compote Rhubarbe or Ekoplaza rabarber?

Overall, Ekoplaza rabarber has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ekoplaza rabarber has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 95 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ekoplaza rabarber has less sugar: 12.8 g versus 21.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons