Comparison
Compote de rhubarbe vs Ekoplaza rabarber
Overall, Ekoplaza rabarber has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Compote de rhubarbe | Ekoplaza rabarber |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 103 kcal | 69 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 21.3 g | 12.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ekoplaza rabarber has 33% fewer calories (69 kcal vs 103 kcal).
- Ekoplaza rabarber has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Ekoplaza rabarber has 40% less sugar (12.8 g vs 21.3 g).
- Ekoplaza rabarber has the better Nutri-Score.
- Ekoplaza rabarber is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Compote de rhubarbe
Rhubarbe 79%, sucre, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.
Ekoplaza rabarber
80% rabarber, agavesiroop*. *Van biologische oorsprong
FAQ
Which is healthier: Compote de rhubarbe or Ekoplaza rabarber?
Overall, Ekoplaza rabarber has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ekoplaza rabarber has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 103 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ekoplaza rabarber has less sugar: 12.8 g versus 21.3 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Compote de Rhubarbe vs Compote de rhubarbe
Compote de rhubarbe vs Compote rhubarbe avec mo...
Compote de rhubarbe vs Ekoplaza rabarber
La Compote de Rhubarbe vs Ekoplaza rabarber
Compote rhubarbe vs Ekoplaza rabarber
Compote Rhubarbe vs Ekoplaza rabarber
Compote rhubarbe avec mo... vs Ekoplaza rabarber
Compote de Rhubarbe vs Ekoplaza rabarber