Comparison

Colin d’alaska à la florentine vs Saumon rose du pacifique a l'oseille

Overall, Colin d’alaska à la florentine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientColin d’alaska à la florenti...Saumon rose du pacifique a l...
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group — —
Calories 91 kcal 105 kcal
Fat 3.7 g 5.4 g
Saturated fat 2.5 g 2.8 g
Sugars 1.2 g 1.3 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.5 g
Fiber — 0.5 g
Protein 11 g 11 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Colin d’alaska à la florentine has 13% fewer calories (91 kcal vs 105 kcal).
  • Colin d’alaska à la florentine has 31% less fat (3.7 g vs 5.4 g).

Ingredients

Colin d’alaska à la florentine

Not available.

Saumon rose du pacifique a l'oseille

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Colin d’alaska à la florentine or Saumon rose du pacifique a l'oseille?

Overall, Colin d’alaska à la florentine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Colin d’alaska à la florentine has fewer calories: 91 kcal versus 105 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Colin d’alaska à la florentine has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons