Comparison

Colin d'Alaska à la Bordelaise vs Filets gourmet à la Bordelaise

Overall, Filets gourmet à la Bordelaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientColin d'Alaska à la Bordelai...Filets gourmet à la Bordelai...
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group — 4
Calories 158 kcal 168 kcal
Fat 9.8 g 10 g
Saturated fat 2.9 g 1.5 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.6 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.8 g
Fiber — 0.8 g
Protein 5.4 g 13 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedFish, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filets gourmet à la Bordelaise has 48% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Filets gourmet à la Bordelaise has 58% more protein (13 g vs 5.4 g).
  • Filets gourmet à la Bordelaise has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Filets gourmet à la Bordelaise lists: Fish, Gluten.

Ingredients

Colin d'Alaska à la Bordelaise

Not available.

Filets gourmet à la Bordelaise

Filets de _poisson_ _colin_ de l'Alaska (Theragra chalcogramma) 75 %, eau, huile de colza, farine de _blé_, vin blanc, sel de cuisine, persil, épices, fécule modifiée de pommes de terre, sucre, condiment, glucose, levure, acidifiant: acide citrique, jus de citron, épaississant: gomme guar, arôme naturel.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Colin d'Alaska à la Bordelaise or Filets gourmet à la Bordelaise?

Overall, Filets gourmet à la Bordelaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Colin d'Alaska à la Bordelaise has fewer calories: 158 kcal versus 168 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Colin d'Alaska à la Bordelaise has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons